Music Controller Vibrator Egg

Some companies are big and some are small: “anonymous factories”. In fact those factories watch the market flows, what consumers buy and afterwards they create similar product – that way the increase incomes.
This product is the copycat.
Advantages – Stylish, attractive, cheap.
Disadvantages – So delicate.





In Detail:

“Lush” company (Hong-Kong) invented a new vibrator, about 3 years ago. It comes only in pink, it slides exactly to your sensitive spot and it works on sound from your phone mic (tail wireless controller).
Slowly it became a hit among sex chat rooms. Besides the high retail price (around 150 USD) 1 out 3 devices died. Needless to say those specific vibrators went the extra mile because of the profession of sex chat girls.
Chinese factory saw the success and make a copycat, did the guys made a good job ? generally speaking: yes! and in particular this product is 1 on 1 the original’s style, it feels the same way, beautiful, battery life same as the original and the price is around 20 bucks. The item is also gentle (just like the original one), it doens’t break but the wireless receiver stops to work – reception became weaker until it stopped to work.
Bye Bye 20 dollars but not 150, so there is nothing to add.

Comfort: 8/10 (same as the original).
Design: 8/10 (same as the original).
Practicality: 2/10 (Destroyed but there were cool stuff).
Price: 5/10 (making a copycat can cost a lot of money).
Personal Rank: 3/10 (Disappointments and investments should be separated).

Summary: 5.2/10
The original wasn’t reliable so why should we expect the 1 on 1 copy should be ?
My recommendation is not to buy this product , just for the fact I counted 1 disadvantage out of many and duo to the fact it was destroyed (this fact alone is enough).
Half ranking only because of styling means grange – you were warned.

Note:
One of the companies that produced this product is Leten and it stopped because of the “Pet Vagina vibrator”  had problems and it was supposed to be the upgraded to the original product. The pictures I brought actually belongs to Leten, not because of the high quality but only to the fact that’s how the copycat looks just without the logo.

Leave a Reply